Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | GHS MelchettipattuTiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306410026445/100 | Pups ViswanthangalTiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306141120185/100 | Pups RamapuramTiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306140810192/100 | Pups AgaramThandrampet, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306170010193/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | State Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 6–10 | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–5 |
| Medium | Tamil | Tamil | Tamil | Tamil |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2025 | 1987 | 1963 | 1959 |
| Area | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 45 · Several gaps | 85 · Well equipped | 92 · Well equipped | 93 · Well equippedBest |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 0% of schools in Tiruvannamalai | Better equipped than 20% of schools in Tiruvannamalai | Better equipped than 51% of schools in Tiruvannamalai | Better equipped than 62% of schools in TiruvannamalaiBest |
| Teachers (/30) | 0 | 26.4Best | 26.4Best | 26.4Best |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 22 | 25Best | 22 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 15 | 22 | 26 | 30Best |
| Access for every child (/15) | 5 | 15Best | 15Best | 15Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 78 | 24 | 27 | 26 |
| Teachers | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Students per teacher | — | 12Best | 13.5 | 13 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | — | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | — | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Women teachers | — | 100% | 50% | 50% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | None | 5Best | 5Best | 4 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Yes |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| In good condition | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Students per classroom | 26 | 24 | 13.5 | 13Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.