Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Pups BhanunagarPudupalayam, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306150100192/100 | Pups KozhambadiCheyyar, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306020190178/100 | GHSS AmmapalayamPudupalayam, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306150050198/100 | Pums AdivaramPudupalayam, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306150010193/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | State Board | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–5 | 1–5 | 6–12 | 1–8 |
| Medium | Tamil | Tamil | Tamil | Tamil, English |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1989 | 1961 | 2001 | 1959 |
| Area | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 92 · Well equipped | 78 · Most basics in place | 98 · Well equippedBest | 93 · Well equipped |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 51% of schools in Tiruvannamalai | Better equipped than 6% of schools in Tiruvannamalai | Better equipped than 88% of schools in TiruvannamalaiBest | Better equipped than 62% of schools in Tiruvannamalai |
| Teachers (/30) | 26.4 | 24.4 | 29.3Best | 26.2 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 26 | 20.9 | 29Best | 29Best |
| Access for every child (/15) | 15Best | 8 | 15Best | 13 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 30 | 48 | 370 | 102 |
| Teachers | 2 | 2 | 18 | 5 |
| Students per teacher | 15Best | 24 | 20.6 | 20.4 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 50% | 83% | 60% |
| Women teachers | 100% | 100% | 61% | 100% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 5 | 3 | 19Best | 14 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Yes | Yes |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | Yes | Not reported | Yes | No |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 3 | 1 | 12 | 6 |
| In good condition | 100%Best | 100%Best | 67% | 67% |
| Students per classroom | 10Best | 48 | 30.8 | 17 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.