Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Pums KarungalikuppamChetpet, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306110210186/100 | Pups EyakolathurChetpet, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306110140180/100 | Pums KozhavurChetpet, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306110260193/100 | Pups MandakolathurChetpet, Tiruvannamalai · UDISE 3306110320297/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–8 | 1–5 | 1–8 | 1–5 |
| Medium | Tamil | Tamil | Tamil | Tamil |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1966 | 1935 | 1951 | 1918 |
| Area | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai | Rural · Tiruvannamalai |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 86 · Well equipped | 80 · Well equipped | 93 · Well equipped | 97 · Well equippedBest |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 24% of schools in Tiruvannamalai | Better equipped than 8% of schools in Tiruvannamalai | Better equipped than 62% of schools in Tiruvannamalai | Better equipped than 84% of schools in TiruvannamalaiBest |
| Teachers (/30) | 27.8 | 21.2 | 28.5Best | 27.6 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 23.4 | 26 | 24.9 | 29.4Best |
| Access for every child (/15) | 10 | 8 | 15Best | 15Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 119 | 11 | 70 | 75 |
| Teachers | 5 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| Students per teacher | 23.8 | 11Best | 11.7 | 25 |
| Single-teacher school | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Women teachers | 100% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 16 | 4 | 17Best | 6 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Yes | Not reported | Yes | Yes |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | Yes | Not reported | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 8 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| In good condition | 13% | 100%Best | 63% | 80% |
| Students per classroom | 14.9 | 5.5Best | 8.8 | 15 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.