Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Pri.Ashram School Kasabe DigrajMiraj, Sangli · UDISE 2735050030596/100 | Yashavantrao Chavan Vidy. Mouje DigrajMiraj, Sangli · UDISE 2735050020387/100 | Z.P.SCH. Chandoli Vasahat K.DigrajMiraj, Sangli · UDISE 2735050030175/100 | Ankur Balvidaymandir TungMiraj, Sangli · UDISE 2735050010690/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | State Board | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–8 | 8–10 | 1–4 | 1–8 |
| Medium | Marathi | Marathi | Marathi | Marathi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1994 | 1989 | 1996 | 2002 |
| Area | Rural · Sangli | Rural · Sangli | Rural · Sangli | Rural · Sangli |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 96 · Well equippedBest | 87 · Well equipped | 75 · Most basics in place | 90 · Well equipped |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 84% of schools in SangliBest | Better equipped than 32% of schools in Sangli | Better equipped than 4% of schools in Sangli | Better equipped than 45% of schools in Sangli |
| Teachers (/30) | 29.6Best | 24.2 | 17.5 | 26.9 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 22 | 25Best | 25Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 26Best | 25.7 | 17 | 23.6 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 235 | 111 | 9 | 464 |
| Teachers | 11 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| Students per teacher | 21.4 | 37 | 9Best | 30.9 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | No |
| Graduate teachers | 91% | 100%Best | 0% | 93% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Women teachers | 45% | 33% | 100% | 53% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 25Best | 4 | None | 5 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 9 | 6 | 3 | 16 |
| In good condition | 100%Best | 100%Best | 0% | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 26.1 | 18.5 | 3Best | 29 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.