Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Sankalp Hindi PrimaryKalyan Dombivli-Urc1, Thane · UDISE 2721060480287/100 | Rajeev Gandhi Secondary School ( Eng )Kalyan Dombivli-Urc1, Thane · UDISE 2721060481584/100 | Janseva Hindi High SchoolKalyan Dombivli-Urc1, Thane · UDISE 2721060481393/100 | Samata Sarvajanik Hindi PriKalyan Dombivli-Urc1, Thane · UDISE 2721060480679/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Private | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | State Board | State Board | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–7 | 8–10 | 5–10 | 1–7 |
| Medium | Hindi | English | Hindi | Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1995 | 2004 | 1993 | 1990 |
| Area | Urban · Thane | Urban · Thane | Urban · Thane | Urban · Thane |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 87 · Well equipped | 84 · Well equipped | 93 · Well equippedBest | 79 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 42% of schools in Thane | Better equipped than 27% of schools in Thane | Better equipped than 71% of schools in ThaneBest | Better equipped than 11% of schools in Thane |
| Teachers (/30) | 28.3Best | 14 | 27.3 | 25.3 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 25Best | 25Best | 19 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 20.4 | 29.9Best | 25.2 | 19.3 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 13 | 15Best | 15Best | 15Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 134 | 217 | 266 | 101 |
| Teachers | 7 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| Students per teacher | 19.1Best | 54.3 | 29.6 | 25.3 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 57% | 100%Best | 89% | 50% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 0% | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Women teachers | 86% | 50% | 44% | 25% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 3 | 26Best | 6 | 1 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Yes | Yes | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | No | Yes | No | No |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 8 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
| In good condition | 75% | 100%Best | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 16.8 | 36.2 | 26.6 | 12.6Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.