Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Ziila Parishad Pri SCH TupadiNilanga, Latur · UDISE 2728041370179/100 | Kai Kantika More Balsanskar Kendra SangaviNilanga, Latur · UDISE 2728040230479/100 | Ziila Parishad Pri SCH Yelamwadi OldNilanga, Latur · UDISE 2728041500163/100 | Gos Ul-Ulum Urdu P.S.Nilanga, Latur · UDISE 2728040012172/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Private | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–7 | 1–5 | 1–4 | 1–7 |
| Medium | Marathi | Marathi | Marathi | Urdu |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1946 | 2016 | 1964 | 1994 |
| Area | Rural · Latur | Rural · Latur | Rural · Latur | Urban · Latur |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 79 · Most basics in placeBest | 79 · Most basics in placeBest | 63 · Most basics in place | 72 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 33% of schools in LaturBest | Better equipped than 33% of schools in LaturBest | Better equipped than 2% of schools in Latur | Better equipped than 13% of schools in Latur |
| Teachers (/30) | 28.3 | 28.4Best | 21.5 | 19.4 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 25Best | 16 | 25Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 11 | 22.6Best | 15 | 20 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 15Best | 3 | 10 | 8 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 111 | 62 | 3 | 133 |
| Teachers | 7 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Students per teacher | 15.9 | 12.4 | 3Best | 33.3 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | No |
| Graduate teachers | 57% | 60% | 100%Best | 0% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Women teachers | 29% | 60% | 0% | 25% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Internet | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 1 | 2Best | None | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | Yes | No | No | No |
| Handrails | Yes | Not reported | Yes | No |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 8 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| In good condition | 0% | 0% | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 13.9 | 12.4 | 1.5Best | 19 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.