Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Saraswati Shishu Mandir Patha KhurdKesli, Sagar · UDISE 2311071030382/100 | PS Patha KhurdKesli, Sagar · UDISE 2311071030283/100 | MS TulsiparKesli, Sagar · UDISE 2311071090273/100 | MS Singpur (Kesli)Kesli, Sagar · UDISE 2311071200274/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Private | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–8 | 1–5 | 1–8 | 6–8 |
| Medium | Hindi, English, Sanskrit | Hindi, English, Sanskrit | Hindi, English, Sanskrit | Hindi, English, Sanskrit |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2008 | 1972 | 2008 | 2001 |
| Area | Rural · Sagar | Rural · Sagar | Rural · Sagar | Rural · Sagar |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 82 · Well equipped | 83 · Well equippedBest | 73 · Most basics in place | 74 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 65% of schools in Sagar | Better equipped than 70% of schools in SagarBest | Better equipped than 23% of schools in Sagar | Better equipped than 26% of schools in Sagar |
| Teachers (/30) | 24 | 24.4 | 25.4 | 28.7Best |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 25Best | 15 | 25Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 20 | 24Best | 22.5 | 12 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 13Best | 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 30 | 49 | 71 | 40 |
| Teachers | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Students per teacher | 7.5Best | 24.5 | 14.2 | 13.3 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 25% | 50% | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 100%Best | 40% | 67% |
| Women teachers | 75% | 100% | 20% | 100% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Working computers & tablets | None | 1 | 2Best | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | Yes | No | No | No |
| Handrails | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 10 | 3 | 7 | 4 |
| In good condition | 100%Best | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 3Best | 16.3 | 10.1 | 10 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.