Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | PS Nadi KheraJatara, Tikamgarh · UDISE 2308021470466/100 | PS VijaypurJatara, Tikamgarh · UDISE 2308021280177/100 | Pri Daffodil English High School JataraJatara, Tikamgarh · UDISE 2308021990178/100 | HS Lidhora TaalJatara, Tikamgarh · UDISE 2308021340567/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Private | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | State Board | State Board |
| Classes | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–10 | 1–10 |
| Medium | Hindi | Hindi | English, Hindi | Hindi, English |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1997 | 1997 | 2005 | 2002 |
| Area | Rural · Tikamgarh | Rural · Tikamgarh | Urban · Tikamgarh | Rural · Tikamgarh |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 66 · Most basics in place | 77 · Most basics in place | 78 · Most basics in placeBest | 67 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 17% of schools in Tikamgarh | Better equipped than 67% of schools in Tikamgarh | Better equipped than 71% of schools in TikamgarhBest | Better equipped than 21% of schools in Tikamgarh |
| Teachers (/30) | 22.4Best | 22.4Best | 17.6 | 21.1 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22 | 22 | 25Best | 25Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 13.5 | 25Best | 20.8 | 11.2 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 8 | 8 | 15Best | 10 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 46 | 32 | 526 | 595 |
| Teachers | 2 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| Students per teacher | 23 | 16Best | 52.6 | 39.7 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 0% | 0% | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 100%Best | 90% | 53% |
| Women teachers | 50% | 0% | 50% | 27% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Working computers & tablets | None | 2 | 3Best | 2 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | Yes | No |
| Handrails | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 2 | 3 | 30 | 12 |
| In good condition | 50% | 67% | 100%Best | 17% |
| Students per classroom | 23 | 10.7Best | 17.5 | 49.6 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.