Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Danapur P.U.P.SChikiti, Ganjam · UDISE 2119070160191/100 | Limakudia P.S.Chikiti, Ganjam · UDISE 2119070930191/100 | Regional Science Higher Secondary School SorolaChikiti, Ganjam · UDISE 2119070184181/100 | Erendra U.P.S.Chikiti, Ganjam · UDISE 2119070170186/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | State Board | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–8 | 1–5 | 11–12 | 1–8 |
| Medium | Oriya, Telugu | Oriya | Oriya, English | Oriya |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1952 | 1957 | 1993 | 1962 |
| Area | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 91 · Well equippedBest | 91 · Well equippedBest | 81 · Well equipped | 86 · Well equipped |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 71% of schools in GanjamBest | Better equipped than 71% of schools in GanjamBest | Better equipped than 18% of schools in Ganjam | Better equipped than 40% of schools in Ganjam |
| Teachers (/30) | 26.4Best | 24.9 | 18 | 25.8 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 24.2 | 25.9Best | 23.1 | 20 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 51 | 67 | 685 | 87 |
| Teachers | 7 | 3 | 13 | 6 |
| Students per teacher | 7.3Best | 22.3 | 52.7 | 14.5 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 86% | 33% | 100%Best | 67% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 43% | 100%Best | 100%Best | 67% |
| Women teachers | 14% | 100% | 31% | 33% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 1 | 3 | 5Best | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Yes | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
| In good condition | 75% | 100%Best | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 12.8Best | 33.5 | 137 | 21.8 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.