Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Pattiguda G.P. High School.Sanakhemundi, Ganjam · UDISE 2119200985191/100 | Natabar U.P.S SundarapurSanakhemundi, Ganjam · UDISE 2119200980384/100 | Jharana N.P.S.Sanakhemundi, Ganjam · UDISE 2119201000481/100 | Science Higher Secondary School PudamariSanakhemundi, Ganjam · UDISE 2119201074170/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | State Board | Not stated | Not stated | State Board |
| Classes | 8–10 | 6–8 | 1–5 | 11–12 |
| Medium | Oriya, English, Hindi, Sanskrit | Oriya | Oriya | English, Oriya |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1997 | 1996 | 2010 | 1994 |
| Area | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 91 · Well equippedBest | 84 · Well equipped | 81 · Well equipped | 70 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 71% of schools in GanjamBest | Better equipped than 29% of schools in Ganjam | Better equipped than 18% of schools in Ganjam | Better equipped than 2% of schools in Ganjam |
| Teachers (/30) | 25Best | 24 | 24.4 | 16 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 25Best | 21 | 25Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 26Best | 20 | 26Best | 17.3 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 15Best | 15Best | 10 | 12 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 133 | 42 | 14 | 575 |
| Teachers | 4 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
| Students per teacher | 33.3 | 21 | 7Best | 47.9 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 75%Best | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 50% | 100%Best | 92% |
| Women teachers | 25% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 9Best | None | 1 | 3 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Handrails | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| In good condition | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Students per classroom | 26.6 | 21 | 7Best | 95.8 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.