Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Balarampalli Project PSAska, Ganjam · UDISE 2119011020183/100 | Pragati Vidyapitha.Aska, Ganjam · UDISE 2119010710298/100 | Nuapalli U.P.SAska, Ganjam · UDISE 2119010260180/100 | Chatula P.S.Aska, Ganjam · UDISE 2119010700182/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | State Board | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–5 | 9–10 | 1–8 | 1–5 |
| Medium | Oriya | Oriya | Oriya | Oriya |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2004 | 1956 | 1945 | 1960 |
| Area | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam | Rural · Ganjam |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 83 · Well equipped | 98 · Well equippedBest | 80 · Well equipped | 82 · Well equipped |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 25% of schools in Ganjam | Better equipped than 93% of schools in GanjamBest | Better equipped than 15% of schools in Ganjam | Better equipped than 21% of schools in Ganjam |
| Teachers (/30) | 26.4 | 30Best | 26.3 | 22.4 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 22 | 28.5Best | 13.8 | 20 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 10 | 15Best | 15Best | 15Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 21 | 110 | 43 | 26 |
| Teachers | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 |
| Students per teacher | 10.5Best | 15.7 | 14.3 | 13 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 100%Best | 100%Best | 100%Best | 50% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 100%Best | 100%Best | 50% |
| Women teachers | 100% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 1 | 2Best | None | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Yes | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 2 | 8 | 5 | 2 |
| In good condition | 100%Best | 88% | 60% | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 10.5 | 13.8 | 8.6Best | 13 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.