Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Project High School Pader KolaAmrapara, Pakur · UDISE 2010120060277/100 | Upg Govt. MS ChhavitokTaljhari, Sahebganj · UDISE 2009090020130/100 | Diwakalin PS PadarkolaAmrapara, Pakur · UDISE 2010120060410/100 | Upg. PS PaderkolaTaljhari, Sahebganj · UDISE 2009090130260/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | State Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 9–12 | 1–8 | 1–5 | 1–5 |
| Medium | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1979 | 1987 | 1956 | 2005 |
| Area | Rural · Pakur | Rural · Sahebganj | Rural · Pakur | Rural · Sahebganj |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 77 · Most basics in placeBest | 30 · Many basics missing | 10 · Many basics missing | 60 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 93% of schools in PakurBest | Better equipped than 2% of schools in Sahebganj | Better equipped than 0% of schools in Pakur | Better equipped than 62% of schools in Sahebganj |
| Teachers (/30) | 30Best | 15.3 | 1.2 | 20.4 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22Best | 0 | 6 | 19 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 20Best | 12 | 3 | 11 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 5 | 3 | 0 | 10Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 219 | 28 | 50 | 45 |
| Teachers | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Students per teacher | 18.3Best | 28 | 50 | 22.5 |
| Single-teacher school | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | Yes — one teacher for every class | No |
| Graduate teachers | 100%Best | 100%Best | 0% | 50% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Women teachers | 42% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Not reported as available | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | No | No | No |
| Electricity | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | No | No | No |
| Working computers & tablets | 1Best | None | None | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Yes | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Playground | No | Yes | No | No |
| Boundary wall | No | No | No | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | No | Not reported | Not reported | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 9 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| In good condition | 100%Best | 0% | 0% | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 24.3 | 5.6Best | 25 | 15 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.