Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Upg MS Nawadih- 2Littipara, Pakur · UDISE 2010110070268/100 | Upg PS Chhota KeschipriPathna, Sahebganj · UDISE 2009410000716/100 | Upg .P.S. NawadihPalojori, Deoghar · UDISE 2007061050151/100 | PS NawadihLittipara, Pakur · UDISE 2010110070157/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–8 | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–5 |
| Medium | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1975 | 2023 | 2003 | 1975 |
| Area | Rural · Pakur | Rural · Sahebganj | Rural · Deoghar | Rural · Pakur |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 68 · Most basics in placeBest | 16 · Many basics missing | 51 · Several gaps | 57 · Several gaps |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 67% of schools in PakurBest | Better equipped than 0% of schools in Sahebganj | Better equipped than 8% of schools in Deoghar | Better equipped than 29% of schools in Pakur |
| Teachers (/30) | 10.3 | 12.9Best | 1.2 | 6.2 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22Best | 0 | 22Best | 22Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 25.5Best | 3 | 24.9 | 19.3 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 10Best | 0 | 3 | 10Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 194 | 34 | 52 | 48 |
| Teachers | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Students per teacher | 64.7 | 34Best | 52 | 48 |
| Single-teacher school | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | Yes — one teacher for every class | Yes — one teacher for every class |
| Graduate teachers | 67% | 100%Best | 0% | 100%Best |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 33%Best | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Women teachers | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Not reported as available | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 12Best | None | 1 | 1 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Yes | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | No | No | Yes | No |
| Boundary wall | No | No | No | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | Yes | Not reported | Not reported | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 11 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| In good condition | 82% | 0% | 100%Best | 40% |
| Students per classroom | 17.6 | 17 | 26 | 9.6Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.