Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Qmax Public SchoolBorio, Sahebganj · UDISE 2009060671775/100 | Diwakalin Pa. Ka. PS. Pokharia MahuagarhiKathikund, Dumka · UDISE 2011090040319/100 | Project KN Girls HS BorioBorio, Sahebganj · UDISE 2009060670665/100 | Upg Govt. MS Bara BiyasiBorio, Sahebganj · UDISE 2009060670541/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Private | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | State Board | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–8 | 1–5 | 9–10 | 1–8 |
| Medium | English | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls only | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2015 | 1986 | 1981 | 1971 |
| Area | Rural · Sahebganj | Rural · Dumka | Rural · Sahebganj | Rural · Sahebganj |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 75 · Most basics in placeBest | 19 · Many basics missing | 65 · Most basics in place | 41 · Several gaps |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 93% of schools in SahebganjBest | Better equipped than 0% of schools in Dumka | Better equipped than 75% of schools in Sahebganj | Better equipped than 11% of schools in Sahebganj |
| Teachers (/30) | 24.5Best | 7.9 | 18 | 4.8 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22 | 6 | 22 | 25Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 21Best | 0 | 17 | 8 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 7 | 5 | 8Best | 3 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 125 | 36 | 408 | 76 |
| Teachers | 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Students per teacher | 15.6Best | 36 | 136 | 76 |
| Single-teacher school | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | No | Yes — one teacher for every class |
| Graduate teachers | 63% | 0% | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 0% | 0% | 100%Best | 0% |
| Women teachers | 38% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | No | Girls' school | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | No | No | Yes | No |
| Working computers & tablets | 27Best | None | 1 | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Yes | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | No | No | No |
| Boundary wall | No | No | No | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | Yes | No | No | Not reported |
| Medical check-ups | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 8 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| In good condition | 100%Best | — | 100%Best | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 15.6 | — | 102 | 9.5Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.