Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Primary School KaileIchak, Hazaribagh · UDISE 2004090140146/100 | S.T. Residential P.S. HunterganjHunterganj, Chatra · UDISE 2003030431158/100 | Upg P.S. PartandIchak, Hazaribagh · UDISE 2004090400266/100 | Urdu Upg M.S. Ichak (Maqtab)Ichak, Hazaribagh · UDISE 2004090430168/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–8 |
| Medium | Hindi | Hindi, English | Hindi | Urdu, Hindi, English |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1986 | 1998 | 2005 | 1945 |
| Area | Rural · Hazaribagh | Rural · Chatra | Rural · Hazaribagh | Rural · Hazaribagh |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 46 · Several gaps | 58 · Several gaps | 66 · Most basics in place | 68 · Most basics in placeBest |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 2% of schools in Hazaribagh | Better equipped than 33% of schools in Chatra | Better equipped than 42% of schools in Hazaribagh | Better equipped than 50% of schools in HazaribaghBest |
| Teachers (/30) | 13.2 | 21 | 22.4Best | 22.3 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 21 | 22 | 19 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 8 | 6 | 19 | 24Best |
| Access for every child (/15) | 0 | 10Best | 3 | 3 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 10 | 64 | 9 | 148 |
| Teachers | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Students per teacher | 10 | 32 | 4.5Best | 29.6 |
| Single-teacher school | Yes — one teacher for every class | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 0% | 100%Best | 100%Best | 80% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 0% | 50%Best | 0% | 40% |
| Women teachers | 0% | 0% | 50% | 20% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | None | None | 1 | 2Best |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | No | No | No | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | No | Yes | No | No |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | Not reported | Yes | Not reported | Not reported |
| Medical check-ups | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| In good condition | 0% | 100%Best | 0% | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 5 | 12.8 | 4.5Best | 37 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.