Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Project Kartik Oraon +2 High School ManatuManatu, Palamu · UDISE 2002080030166/100 | Upg MS Chak Barka TolaManatu, Palamu · UDISE 2002080110235/100 | Upg PS Manatu BhuiyatolaManatu, Palamu · UDISE 2002080031061/100 | Upg MS BhaisledwaManatu, Palamu · UDISE 2002080450243/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | State Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 9–12 | 1–8 | 1–5 | 1–8 |
| Medium | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1982 | 2004 | 2003 | 2003 |
| Area | Rural · Palamu | Rural · Palamu | Rural · Palamu | Rural · Palamu |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 66 · Most basics in placeBest | 35 · Many basics missing | 61 · Most basics in place | 43 · Several gaps |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 71% of schools in PalamuBest | Better equipped than 1% of schools in Palamu | Better equipped than 53% of schools in Palamu | Better equipped than 6% of schools in Palamu |
| Teachers (/30) | 16.5Best | 0.8 | 11.3 | 0.8 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22Best | 19 | 22Best | 19 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 24.1Best | 7.5 | 17.9 | 15.3 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 3 | 8 | 10Best | 8 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 1,048 | 272 | 88 | 123 |
| Teachers | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Students per teacher | 349.3 | 272 | 44Best | 123 |
| Single-teacher school | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | No | Yes — one teacher for every class |
| Graduate teachers | 100%Best | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Women teachers | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 23Best | 1 | 1 | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Yes | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | No | No | No |
| Boundary wall | No | No | No | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | Not reported | No | Yes | No |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| In good condition | 33% | 40% | 40% | 75%Best |
| Students per classroom | 174.7 | 54.4 | 17.6 | 15.4Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.