Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Shiksha Niketan Model Public SchoolPanki, Palamu · UDISE 2002032120277/100 | Upg PS Semartand PankiPanki, Palamu · UDISE 2002030011256/100 | Rajkiyekrit Kanya MS PankiPanki, Palamu · UDISE 2002030010365/100 | Upg PS Muslimtola ChourahaPanki, Palamu · UDISE 2002030011054/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Private | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–8 | 1–5 | 1–8 | 1–5 |
| Medium | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2018 | 2006 | 1960 | 2006 |
| Area | Rural · Palamu | Rural · Palamu | Rural · Palamu | Rural · Palamu |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 77 · Most basics in placeBest | 56 · Several gaps | 65 · Most basics in place | 54 · Several gaps |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 94% of schools in PalamuBest | Better equipped than 37% of schools in Palamu | Better equipped than 68% of schools in Palamu | Better equipped than 30% of schools in Palamu |
| Teachers (/30) | 27Best | 17.2 | 14.5 | 5.2 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 22 | 22 | 19 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 20.1 | 17 | 24Best | 21.6 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 5 | 0 | 5 | 8Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 44 | 12 | 309 | 106 |
| Teachers | 8 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| Students per teacher | 5.5Best | 12 | 51.5 | 106 |
| Single-teacher school | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | No | Yes — one teacher for every class |
| Graduate teachers | 75% | 100%Best | 67% | 100%Best |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 50% | 0% | 83%Best | 0% |
| Women teachers | 50% | 0% | 83% | 0% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 5 | 1 | 6Best | 1 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Yes | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | No | Not reported | No | No |
| Medical check-ups | No | No | No | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 8 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
| In good condition | 38% | 100%Best | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 5.5Best | 6 | 30.9 | 53 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.