Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Holy Emmanuel AcademyNaxalbari, Siliguri · UDISE 1921030010877/100 | Barakothi Panighatta SSKMirik Circle, Darjiling · UDISE 1901320480151/100 | Chenga Primary SchoolMirik Circle, Darjiling · UDISE 1901320310151/100 | Kolabari Forest Village PRY. SchoolNaxalbari, Siliguri · UDISE 1921030030174/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Private | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–5 | 1–4 | 1–5 | 1–4 |
| Medium | Hindi, English | English | English | Nepali |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2017 | 2003 | 1968 | 1985 |
| Area | Rural · Siliguri | Rural · Darjiling | Rural · Darjiling | Rural · Siliguri |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 77 · Most basics in placeBest | 51 · Several gaps | 51 · Several gaps | 74 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 78% of schools in SiliguriBest | Better equipped than 29% of schools in Darjiling | Better equipped than 29% of schools in Darjiling | Better equipped than 71% of schools in Siliguri |
| Teachers (/30) | 28.5Best | 20.5 | 24 | 27.2 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22Best | 19 | 19 | 22Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 18.1Best | 3 | 3 | 15 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 8 | 8 | 5 | 10Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 126 | 4 | 13 | 34 |
| Teachers | 11 | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Students per teacher | 11.5 | 1.3Best | 2.2 | 11.3 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 64% | 0% | 17% | 67%Best |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 0% | 33% | 100%Best |
| Women teachers | 82% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | No | No | No |
| Working computers & tablets | 2Best | None | None | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | No | No | No | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Boundary wall | No | No | No | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | No | No | No | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 8 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| In good condition | 50% | 0% | 0% | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 15.8 | 1.3Best | 2.2 | 8.5 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.