Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Charaljani MSKTufanganj-II, Coochbehar · UDISE 1903040910265/100 | Paschim Nakkatigachh SSKTufanganj-II, Coochbehar · UDISE 1903041510354/100 | Dwiporpar Pati Shilpi Para SSKTufanganj-II, Coochbehar · UDISE 1903041530153/100 | Chamta G.Dham PRYTufanganj-II, Coochbehar · UDISE 1903041510276/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 5–8 | 1–4 | 1–4 | 1–5 |
| Medium | Bengali | Bengali | Bengali | Bengali |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2003 | 2000 | 2000 | 1963 |
| Area | Rural · Coochbehar | Rural · Coochbehar | Rural · Coochbehar | Rural · Coochbehar |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 65 · Most basics in place | 54 · Several gaps | 53 · Several gaps | 76 · Most basics in placeBest |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 45% of schools in Coochbehar | Better equipped than 13% of schools in Coochbehar | Better equipped than 11% of schools in Coochbehar | Better equipped than 86% of schools in CoochbeharBest |
| Teachers (/30) | 26Best | 14.7 | 13.5 | 23.8 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22 | 22 | 22 | 25Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 7 | 7 | 7 | 17Best |
| Access for every child (/15) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 43 | 68 | 4 | 125 |
| Teachers | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Students per teacher | 10.8 | 34 | 4Best | 31.3 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | No |
| Graduate teachers | 100%Best | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100%Best |
| Women teachers | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Not reported | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | No | No | No | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | None | None | None | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | No | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | No | No | No | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| In good condition | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 10.8 | 22.7 | 1.3Best | 31.3 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.