Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Mogo Gittim LPSRongjeng, East Garo Hills · UDISE 1702011660157/100 | Chigro Songgital LPSRongjeng, East Garo Hills · UDISE 1702010200322/100 | Imsak Valley Academy LPRongjeng, East Garo Hills · UDISE 1702012060120/100 | Rongjeng Gaoram L.P. SchoolRongjeng, East Garo Hills · UDISE 1702010010862/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Private | Private | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–8 | 1–5 |
| Medium | Mizo | Mizo | English | Mizo |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2002 | 2012 | 2015 | 2008 |
| Area | Rural · East Garo Hills | Rural · East Garo Hills | Rural · East Garo Hills | Rural · East Garo Hills |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 57 · Several gaps | 22 · Many basics missing | 20 · Many basics missing | 62 · Most basics in placeBest |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 55% of schools in East Garo Hills | Better equipped than 0% of schools in East Garo Hills | Better equipped than 0% of schools in East Garo Hills | Better equipped than 71% of schools in East Garo HillsBest |
| Teachers (/30) | 18.4 | 10.4 | 6.3 | 20.4Best |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 19Best | 4 | 0 | 16 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 17 | 5 | 10.3 | 23Best |
| Access for every child (/15) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 50 | 134 | 163 | 20 |
| Teachers | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Students per teacher | 25 | 67 | 54.3 | 10Best |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 0% | 100%Best | 0% | 50% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Women teachers | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Not reported as available | Not reported as available | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | No | No | No |
| Electricity | No | No | No | No |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | None | None | None | 1Best |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | No | No | No | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | No | No | No | No |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| In good condition | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 25 | 134 | 54.3 | 10Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.