Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Dabram U.P.SBaghmara, South Garo Hills · UDISE 1703020060948/100 | Brio Public SchoolBaghmara, South Garo Hills · UDISE 1703020112760/100 | Dabram Sec. SchoolBaghmara, South Garo Hills · UDISE 1703020061252/100 | Dabram L.P.SBaghmara, South Garo Hills · UDISE 1703020061052/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Private | Private | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | State Board | Not stated |
| Classes | 6–8 | 1–8 | 9–10 | 1–5 |
| Medium | English, Mizo | English | English, Mizo | Mizo |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1982 | 2018 | 2017 | 1935 |
| Area | Urban · South Garo Hills | Urban · South Garo Hills | Urban · South Garo Hills | Urban · South Garo Hills |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 48 · Several gaps | 60 · Most basics in placeBest | 52 · Several gaps | 52 · Several gaps |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 44% of schools in South Garo Hills | Better equipped than 80% of schools in South Garo HillsBest | Better equipped than 58% of schools in South Garo Hills | Better equipped than 58% of schools in South Garo Hills |
| Teachers (/30) | 25 | 23.5 | 26Best | 24 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 6 | 22Best | 16 | 0 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 7 | 14.8Best | 7 | 13 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 10 | 0 | 3 | 15Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 45 | 170 | 12 | 81 |
| Teachers | 4 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| Students per teacher | 11.3 | 24.3 | 6Best | 27 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 75% | 57% | 100%Best | 33% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100%Best |
| Women teachers | 50% | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not reported as available |
| Working girls' toilet | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Working boys' toilet | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Handwashing near toilets | No | No | No | No |
| Electricity | No | Yes | No | No |
| Internet | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | None | 2Best | None | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | No | No | No | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Boundary wall | No | Yes | No | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | Yes |
| Handrails | Yes | Not reported | Not reported | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 3 | 10 | 2 | 6 |
| In good condition | 0% | 100%Best | 0% | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 15 | 17 | 6Best | 13.5 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.