Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | PRESBYTERIAN ENGLISH SCHOOL (Elementary Sec.) TLUNGVEL (CH)Thingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030060767/100 | Govt. Tlungvel M/S-IThingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030060580/100 | Govt. Tlungvel M/S-IIThingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030060691/100 | Govt. Tlungvel P/S-IVThingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030060486/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Private | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–8 | 5–8 | 5–8 | 1–4 |
| Medium | English | Bhutia, English | Bhutia, English | Bhutia |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2001 | 1951 | 1973 | 1975 |
| Area | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 67 · Most basics in place | 80 · Well equipped | 91 · Well equippedBest | 86 · Well equipped |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 30% of schools in Aizawl | Better equipped than 77% of schools in Aizawl | Better equipped than 98% of schools in AizawlBest | Better equipped than 92% of schools in Aizawl |
| Teachers (/30) | 28.9Best | 28 | 26.6 | 26.8 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22Best | 19 | 22Best | 22Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 16.4 | 23 | 27Best | 22.3 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 0 | 10 | 15Best | 15Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 134 | 14 | 48 | 40 |
| Teachers | 11 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Students per teacher | 12.2 | 2.3Best | 6.9 | 8 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 73% | 100%Best | 86% | 80% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 50% | 29% | 40% |
| Women teachers | 73% | 50% | 57% | 40% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | No | No | No |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 2 | 1 | 4Best | 1 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Yes | Not reported |
| Library | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | Not reported | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 10 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| In good condition | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 13.4 | 3.5Best | 12 | 10 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.