Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Samaritan Riangvai Run P/S (Ssa)Thingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030020732/100 | Govt. Seling P/SThingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030020181/100 | Samaritan Riangvai Run M/S (Ssa)Thingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030020461/100 | Govt. Tlangkhama Memorial High School, SesawngBawngkawn, Aizawl · UDISE 1503090111565/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | State Board |
| Classes | 1–4 | 1–4 | 5–8 | 9–10 |
| Medium | Bhutia | Bhutia, English | English, Bhutia | English, Bhutia, Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2001 | 1973 | 2001 | 1992 |
| Area | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 32 · Many basics missing | 81 · Well equippedBest | 61 · Most basics in place | 65 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 0% of schools in Aizawl | Better equipped than 79% of schools in AizawlBest | Better equipped than 14% of schools in Aizawl | Better equipped than 23% of schools in Aizawl |
| Teachers (/30) | 0 | 25.8 | 26 | 29.4Best |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 15 | 25Best | 19 | 19 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 14 | 16.7Best | 13 | 13.5 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 3 | 13Best | 3 | 3 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 14 | 60 | 11 | 70 |
| Teachers | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Students per teacher | — | 20 | 2.2Best | 10 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | — | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | — | 33% | 0% | 86%Best |
| Women teachers | — | 33% | 100% | 43% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 1 | 1 | None | 2Best |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | No | No | Yes | No |
| Playground | No | Yes | No | No |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | No | Yes | No | No |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | Yes | No | No |
| Handrails | Not reported | No | Not reported | Not reported |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 |
| In good condition | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 4.7 | 10 | 3.7Best | 35 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.