Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Govt. Tlangkhama Memorial High School, SesawngBawngkawn, Aizawl · UDISE 1503090111565/100 | Don Bosco School- Seling CHThingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030020567/100 | Samaritan Riangvai Run P/S (Ssa)Thingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030020732/100 | C.T.I. P/S (PVT)Bawngkawn, Aizawl · UDISE 1503090110560/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Private | Government | Private |
| Board | State Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 9–10 | 1–8 | 1–4 | 1–4 |
| Medium | English, Bhutia, Hindi | English, Bhutia, Hindi | Bhutia | English |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1992 | 1994 | 2001 | 1992 |
| Area | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 65 · Most basics in place | 67 · Most basics in placeBest | 32 · Many basics missing | 60 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 23% of schools in Aizawl | Better equipped than 30% of schools in AizawlBest | Better equipped than 0% of schools in Aizawl | Better equipped than 12% of schools in Aizawl |
| Teachers (/30) | 29.4Best | 24.9 | 0 | 23.3 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 19 | 22Best | 15 | 19 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 13.5 | 20Best | 14 | 12.9 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 70 | 314 | 14 | 24 |
| Teachers | 7 | 14 | 0 | 6 |
| Students per teacher | 10 | 22.4 | — | 4Best |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 100%Best | 71% | — | 33% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 86%Best | 0% | — | 0% |
| Women teachers | 43% | 79% | — | 33% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | No | No | Yes | No |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Working computers & tablets | 2Best | None | 1 | 1 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | No | Yes | No | No |
| Playground | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Boundary wall | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | No | No | No | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | No |
| Handrails | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | No |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 2 | 10 | 3 | 6 |
| In good condition | 0% | 100%Best | 0% | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 35 | 31.4 | 4.7 | 4Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.