Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Govt. Tlangkhama Memorial High School, SesawngBawngkawn, Aizawl · UDISE 1503090111565/100 | Govt. Seling P/SThingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030020181/100 | Don Bosco School- Seling CHThingsulthliah, Aizawl · UDISE 1503030020567/100 | Govt. Mualmam P/SBawngkawn, Aizawl · UDISE 1503090110354/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Private | Government |
| Board | State Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 9–10 | 1–4 | 1–8 | 1–4 |
| Medium | English, Bhutia, Hindi | Bhutia, English | English, Bhutia, Hindi | Bhutia |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1992 | 1973 | 1994 | 1999 |
| Area | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl | Rural · Aizawl |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 65 · Most basics in place | 81 · Well equippedBest | 67 · Most basics in place | 54 · Several gaps |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 23% of schools in Aizawl | Better equipped than 79% of schools in AizawlBest | Better equipped than 30% of schools in Aizawl | Better equipped than 5% of schools in Aizawl |
| Teachers (/30) | 29.4Best | 25.8 | 24.9 | 26 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 19 | 25Best | 22 | 12 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 13.5 | 16.7 | 20Best | 13 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 3 | 13Best | 0 | 3 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 70 | 60 | 314 | 21 |
| Teachers | 7 | 3 | 14 | 4 |
| Students per teacher | 10 | 20 | 22.4 | 5.3Best |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 100%Best | 100%Best | 71% | 75% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 86%Best | 33% | 0% | 25% |
| Women teachers | 43% | 33% | 79% | 75% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Handwashing near toilets | No | Yes | No | No |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 2Best | 1 | None | None |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Boundary wall | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | No | Yes | No | No |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | Yes | No | No |
| Handrails | Not reported | No | Not reported | Not reported |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
| In good condition | 0% | 0% | 100%Best | 0% |
| Students per classroom | 35 | 10 | 31.4 | 5.3Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.