Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Shivam Education School PirojaEkangar Sarai, Nalanda · UDISE 1027060201176/100 | M.S. KobilIslampur, Nalanda · UDISE 1027100480171/100 | U.M.S Janki BighaEkangar Sarai, Nalanda · UDISE 1027060200175/100 | S.S.Academy,EkangersaraiEkangar Sarai, Nalanda · UDISE 1027060200976/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Private | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | State Board |
| Classes | 1–8 | 1–8 | 1–8 | 9–12 |
| Medium | English, Hindi | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2013 | 1934 | 1972 | 1944 |
| Area | Rural · Nalanda | Rural · Nalanda | Rural · Nalanda | Rural · Nalanda |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 76 · Most basics in placeBest | 71 · Most basics in place | 75 · Most basics in place | 76 · Most basics in placeBest |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 45% of schools in NalandaBest | Better equipped than 17% of schools in Nalanda | Better equipped than 38% of schools in Nalanda | Better equipped than 45% of schools in NalandaBest |
| Teachers (/30) | 25.1 | 17.2 | 27Best | 20.5 |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25Best | 25Best | 22 | 25Best |
| Learning resources (/30) | 25.5Best | 18.6 | 16 | 18.5 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 0 | 10 | 10 | 12Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 105 | 266 | 63 | 1,470 |
| Teachers | 9 | 6 | 5 | 33 |
| Students per teacher | 11.7Best | 44.3 | 12.6 | 44.5 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 33% | 50% | 80% | 97%Best |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 44% | 100%Best | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Women teachers | 33% | 50% | 60% | 61% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 7 | None | None | 10Best |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Yes |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Handrails | Not reported | No | Yes | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | No | No | Yes | No |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 12 | 15 | 5 | 22 |
| In good condition | 83% | 53% | 100%Best | 82% |
| Students per classroom | 8.8Best | 17.7 | 12.6 | 66.8 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.