Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | P.S. Kote Ka PurwaSohawal, Ayodhya · UDISE 0947100250878/100 | Jagdamba Singh Moharkali PS Gokula Arkuna Sohawal AyodhyaSohawal, Ayodhya · UDISE 0947100251775/100 | Prathamik Vidyalaya PilkhawanSohawal, Ayodhya · UDISE 0947100250188/100 | B.L.S.Gaytri V.M., J.H.S. AliganjSohawal, Ayodhya · UDISE 0947100251278/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Private | Government | Private |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Classes | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–5 | 6–8 |
| Medium | Hindi, Sanskrit, English | English | Hindi | Hindi |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 2006 | 2019 | 2006 | 2013 |
| Area | Rural · Ayodhya | Rural · Ayodhya | Rural · Ayodhya | Rural · Ayodhya |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 78 · Most basics in place | 75 · Most basics in place | 88 · Well equippedBest | 78 · Most basics in place |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 36% of schools in Ayodhya | Better equipped than 26% of schools in Ayodhya | Better equipped than 80% of schools in AyodhyaBest | Better equipped than 36% of schools in Ayodhya |
| Teachers (/30) | 27.8 | 24.1 | 28.8 | 30Best |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22 | 22 | 25Best | 22 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 16 | 24.2Best | 18.9 | 20.6 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 12 | 5 | 15Best | 5 |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 34 | 224 | 108 | 31 |
| Teachers | 4 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
| Students per teacher | 8.5 | 37.3 | 10.8 | 7.8Best |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 75% | 100%Best | 70% | 100%Best |
| Women teachers | 75% | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | No | No | Yes | No |
| Internet | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 2 | 3Best | 2 | 1 |
| ICT lab or digital board | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Library | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Playground | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | Yes | No | Yes | Not reported |
| Medical check-ups | No | No | Yes | No |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| In good condition | 67% | 100%Best | 67% | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 11.3 | 28 | 18 | 6.2Best |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.