Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Sheikh-Ul-Alam Public School LadhuPampore, Pulwama · UDISE 0105060075789/100 | Middle School Jeewan SahibPampore, Pulwama · UDISE 0105060070274/100 | Middle School KGBV LadhooPampore, Pulwama · UDISE 0105060075674/100 | Higher Secondary School LadhooPampore, Pulwama · UDISE 0105060072195/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Private | Government | Government | Government |
| Board | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | State Board |
| Classes | 1–8 | 1–8 | 6–8 | 6–12 |
| Medium | English | English | English | English |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls only | Girls and boys (co-ed) |
| Established | 1976 | 1998 | 2008 | 1956 |
| Area | Rural · Pulwama | Rural · Pulwama | Rural · Pulwama | Rural · Pulwama |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 89 · Well equipped | 74 · Most basics in place | 74 · Most basics in place | 95 · Well equippedBest |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 89% of schools in Pulwama | Better equipped than 56% of schools in Pulwama | Better equipped than 56% of schools in Pulwama | Better equipped than 97% of schools in PulwamaBest |
| Teachers (/30) | 26.7 | 27 | 30Best | 30Best |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Learning resources (/30) | 29.3Best | 19.5 | 11 | 25.3 |
| Access for every child (/15) | 8 | 3 | 8 | 15Best |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 202 | 77 | 47 | 305 |
| Teachers | 12 | 5 | 6 | 15 |
| Students per teacher | 16.8 | 15.4 | 7.8Best | 20.3 |
| Single-teacher school | No | No | No | No |
| Graduate teachers | 92% | 80% | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 25% | 100%Best | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Women teachers | 58% | 60% | 100% | 40% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | Yes | Girls' school | Yes |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Electricity | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Internet | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Working computers & tablets | 5 | 6 | None | 17Best |
| ICT lab or digital board | Yes | Yes | Not reported | Yes |
| Library | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Playground | Yes | No | No | No |
| Boundary wall | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Handrails | No | Not reported | Not reported | Yes |
| Medical check-ups | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 11 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| In good condition | 100%Best | 50% | 100%Best | 100%Best |
| Students per classroom | 18.4 | 12.8Best | 15.7 | 43.6 |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how.