Compare
Compare schools
Side by side, from each school's official UDISE+ 2025-26 record. Best values in each row are highlighted. The Schooldoor Score measures reported basics — not teaching quality or results. How the score works.
| School | Project High School Pader KolaAmrapara, Pakur · UDISE 2010120060277/100 | Diwakalin PS PadarkolaAmrapara, Pakur · UDISE 2010120060410/100 | Upg MS JitkoAmrapara, Pakur · UDISE 2010120040144/100 | Pakur averageAll 1,145 schools in the district |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Management | Government | Government | Government | — |
| Board | State Board | Not stated | Not stated | — |
| Classes | 9–12 | 1–5 | 1–8 | — |
| Medium | Hindi | Hindi | Hindi | — |
| Admits | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | Girls and boys (co-ed) | — |
| Established | 1979 | 1956 | 1981 | — |
| Area | Rural · Pakur | Rural · Pakur | Rural · Pakur | — |
| Schooldoor Score | ||||
| Score (out of 100) | 77 · Most basics in placeBest | 10 · Many basics missing | 44 · Several gaps | 62.3 average |
| Rank in district | Better equipped than 93% of schools in PakurBest | Better equipped than 0% of schools in Pakur | Better equipped than 3% of schools in Pakur | — |
| Teachers (/30) | 30Best | 1.2 | 8.9 | — |
| Water, toilets & safety (/25) | 22Best | 6 | 22Best | — |
| Learning resources (/30) | 20Best | 3 | 10 | — |
| Access for every child (/15) | 5Best | 0 | 3 | — |
| Parents say | ||||
| Parent rating (out of 5) | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | No reviews yet | — |
| Students & teachers | ||||
| Students enrolled | 219 | 50 | 196 | — |
| Teachers | 12 | 1 | 3 | — |
| Students per teacher | 18.3Best | 50 | 65.3 | 52.9 average |
| Single-teacher school | No | Yes — one teacher for every class | No | 31.4% of schools |
| Graduate teachers | 100%Best | 0% | 33% | — |
| Regular (not contract) teachers | 100%Best | 0% | 33% | 46.9% |
| Women teachers | 42% | 0% | 67% | 30.9% |
| Facilities | ||||
| Drinking water | Yes | Yes | Yes | 98.3% of schools |
| Working girls' toilet | Yes | No | Yes | 96.3% of schools |
| Working boys' toilet | Yes | No | Yes | — |
| Handwashing near toilets | Yes | No | Yes | — |
| Electricity | Yes | No | Yes | 94.6% of schools |
| Internet | Yes | No | No | 65.7% of schools |
| Working computers & tablets | 1Best | None | 1Best | 59.4% of schools |
| ICT lab or digital board | Yes | Not reported | Not reported | — |
| Library | Yes | No | Yes | 96.2% of schools |
| Playground | No | No | No | 39.8% of schools |
| Boundary wall | No | No | No | — |
| Access for every child | ||||
| Ramps | Yes | No | No | 85.8% of schools |
| Accessible (CWSN) toilet | No | No | No | 6.6% of schools |
| Handrails | No | Not reported | Not reported | — |
| Medical check-ups | No | No | Yes | — |
| Classrooms | ||||
| Classrooms | 9 | 2 | 8 | — |
| In good condition | 100%Best | 0% | 63% | — |
| Students per classroom | 24.3Best | 25 | 24.5 | — |
Data: each school's own UDISE+ 2025-26 report, as self-reported to the Ministry of Education. Check anything important with the school. Parent ratings come from reviews on Schooldoor, weighted toward verified parents and recent reviews — how. You can add more schools below.